Tuesday, January 7, 2025

New Mexico’s Green Amendment Pre-Filed for 2025

Lead Legislators Believe This Could Be A Pivotal Year For The Constitutional Right

Santa Fe, NM: Tuesday, January 7, 2025, legislators announced they had pre-filed the New Mexico Constitutional Green Amendment.  Representative Joanne Ferrary, Senator Harold Pope, Jr., Senator Shannon Pinto, Representative Patricia Roybal Caballero, newly-elected Representative Joseph Hernandez, Senator Antoinette Sedillo Lopez, and Representative Tara Lujan gathered in a zoom meeting to announce the filing of the new language, to discuss why they are prioritizing the New Mexico Green Amendment, and to share why they believe New Mexico legislators and community members need to join forces for passage in 2025.

Representative Joanne Ferrary observes, “A healthy environment is prized by all facets of New Mexico’s communities and cultures. And yet, while some parts of New Mexico enjoy highest quality water, air and soils, others are left to suffer the health and economic ravages of toxic soils, polluted water, contaminated air, and declining ecosystems.  With this amendment, we will ensure that environmental protection is a priority and benefit for all communities here in New Mexico.”

Senator Harold Pope Jr. explains, “We need the Green Amendment in order to secure every New Mexican’s right to clean air, pure water, and healthy ecosystems.  It will empower communities to protect their environment and ensure justice and essential environmental protections for future generations.”

Senator Shannon Pinto adds:  “The amendment, with its statewide coverage, will ensure we are providing essential protection to all parts of our community, including the places where children go to school, where people work and recreate, and to all of our public shared spaces.”

Senator Carrie Hamblen explains: “We are at a pivotal moment for environmental protection and justice in our State.  We can see that our current laws are not properly protecting our State’s water, air and natural resources which are essential for the health, safety and economy of our state. I believe this resolution will help us provide critical and missing protections.”

“For five years, the constituents of New Mexico have sent a resounding message to lawmakers that they want their right to a healthy environment enshrined within our Constitution. This makes pollutive industries very upset because they have been abusing loopholes in our State law and spending outrageous amounts of money funding ‘fossil fuel’ candidates to make sure New Mexico remains exposed to extractive industries— regardless of harm caused to the people of our state. We need a Green Amendment to remedy this injustice. So long as we lack the necessary guardrails, like the Green Amendment, habitants of our State remain at risk and we will continue seeing healthy declines of our children, wildfires rage, flash floods inundate rural areas, and see the overall decline of otherwise healthy communities. Our right to clean air, soil, and environment should be a Constitutional right and protected above profits for the few elite. We will not give up the fight for Justice until a Green Amendment is passed to protect our children and future generations!”  – Patricia Roybal Caballero, State Representative, House District 13.  

Senator Antoinette Sedillo Lopez offers: “New Mexico is recognized for our beautiful and healthy environments – people come from all over the world to enjoy the beauty of New Mexico.  The economic, health and quality of life benefits that result for New Mexico communities and businesses are incalculable. We must ensure constitutional protection so that we may protect the health and welfare of our people and address the places where we have fallen short by allowing some of our communities to suffer from devastating levels of pollution and degradation. Especially when our environment is at risk due to potential federal changes, this is a smart step and investment for all of New Mexico.”

Representative Joseph Hernandez adds: “The Green Amendment will help ensure that our future generations and the environment are protected while helping us diversify our economy and dependency from fossil fuels.”

Representative Tara Lujan adds: “The Green Amendment will be a tool that can help ensure that our government prioritizes environmental protection in decision-making and that we continue to prioritize these protections for future generations.”

“While we have seen many states use existing constitutional language to strengthen climate protection, if New Mexico were to pass its proposed Green Amendment, it would become the first state in the nation to explicitly protect a safe climate as an irrevocable fundament right at the constitutional level,” said Maya van Rossum, author of the book, The Green Amendment and founder of the organization Green Amendments For The Generations who is seeking to advance constitutional environmental rights in states across the U.S. and nationally. van Rossum was also a lead plaintiff in the Pennsylvania case that secured constitutional environmental rights for the people of that state. “New Mexico is on the leading edge of the national movement to recognize environmental rights as fundamental inalienable rights deserving the same highest protection that is currently given to speech, religious, civil and property rights,” added van Rossum.

The proposed New Mexico Green Amendment pre-filed for 2025 reads:

SECTION 1. It is proposed to amend Article 2 of the constitution of New Mexico by adding a new:

A. The people of the state shall have a right to clean and healthy air, water, soil and environments; healthy native flora, fauna and ecosystems, and a safe climate;   and to the preservation of the natural, cultural, scenic and healthful qualities of the environment. The state shall protect these rights equitably for all people regardless of race, ethnicity, tribal affiliation, gender, socioeconomics, or geography. 

B. The state, counties and municipalities shall serve as trustee of the natural resources of New Mexico and shall conserve, protect and maintain these resources for the benefit of all the people, including present and future generations.

C. The provisions of this section are self-executing. Monetary damages shall not be awarded for a violation of this section. This section is enforceable against the state, counties and municipalities.  

Constitutional Green Amendments currently exist in three states — Pennsylvania,  Montana, and most recently New York. In addition, Green Amendments have been proposed in 19 other states.  Montana’s Green Amendment was the basis of the recent climate legal victory secured in Held v. Montana.

The New Mexico Green Amendment was first proposed in 2021.  To secure passage of a constitutional amendment, the proposed language must be passed by majority vote in each legislative house, and then secure a majority vote of the citizens of New Mexico.



* This article was originally published here

Monday, January 6, 2025

Union of Concerned Scientists, January 14:

COP29 and What’s Next for Int’l Climate Policy

Register

This past November, world leaders gathered at the United Nations annual climate talks (COP29) with the main goal of securing an ambitious climate finance agreement, alongside reaffirming that nations will take meaningful steps to cut emissions and transition away from fossil fuels as was agreed upon last year.

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) invites you to join a virtual discussion to learn more about our efforts to highlight scientifically necessary outcomes at COP29, how we engaged on the ground during these contentious international climate negotiations and called out the malign influence of fossil fuel interests, and where we go from here—including the impact of the incoming Trump administration which has threatened to exit the Paris Agreement.

COP29 and What’s Next for International Climate Policy

Date: Tuesday, January 14
Time: 4:00–5:00 p.m. ET / 1:00–2:00 p.m. PT

Register for the webinar today.

Coming into COP29, multiple scientific studies showed that funding on the order of $1 trillion per year would be needed to help low-income nations cut emissions, adapt to mounting climate impacts, and address loss and damage. Studies also showed that the global emissions trajectory remains far off track, with the world facing a projected 2.6-3.1°C increase in global average temperatures above pre-industrial levels without urgent corrective action.

The final COP29 deal falls well short of what’s needed, with just $300 billion annually from a variety of sources by 2035 with richer nations making no firm commitment on a specific amount they would offer in public finance. Fossil fuel interests permeated COP29, and their push to maintain massive profits from oil and gas also showed in the flawed final outcome.

UCS experts will share reflections on how the negotiations played out regarding climate science, policy, and corporate influence, and the environmental and climate justice implications—register today.

Thank you to the Henry Kendall Society for hosting this webinar!

REGISTER



* This article was originally published here

Sunday, January 5, 2025

Running a Farm Business with a Partner


In this episode, farmer Jay Reid shares what it's like running a farm with a partner. 

Get time and labor-saving farm tools and microgreen seeds at shop.modern grower.co

Listen to other podcasts on the Modern Grower Podcast Network:

Check out Diego's book Sell Everything You Grow on Amazonhttps://www.amazon.com/Sell-Everything-You-Grow-Homestead-ebook/dp/B0CJC9NTZF



* This article was originally published here

Wednesday, January 1, 2025

Something Our Readers Should Know About

This came in by email on January 1.

Official Statement from Allison Fajans-Turner, Bank Engagement and Policy Lead, Rainforest Action Network:

“America’s largest banks are making a New Year’s resolution to turn back on their climate promises, disgracefully ending 2024 — a year marred by continued bank funding for fossil fuel expansion and policy backtracking — by exiting the Net Zero Banking Alliance for Net Zero (NZBA). Citibank and Bank of America withdrew from NZBA in the waning hours of 2024, a trend started by Wells Fargo and Goldman Sachs on the eve of the holiday season. To JP Morgan Chase and any other U.S. bank considering defecting, RAN reiterates its statement from before the break that leaving the alliance will be seen as an irresponsible and climate hostile act.

RAN, along with many other climate finance campaigning NGOs, sent a letter to the NZBA and GFANZ advisory bodies urging the Alliance to call out defecting members. We are disappointed that instead, GFANZ has purportedly decided to weaken itself by clarifying its role as an advisory body rather than one that would hold its members to scientific standards. These moves, made when most of us are distracted by the holidays, show just how ashamed banks are of their unpopular decisions to backtrack on their climate commitments. If U.S. mega-banks are unwilling to be bound by even the loose requirements of international voluntary associations, then it is all the more imperative that national and state level governments get serious about regulating the banking sector. Otherwise, we all face the devastation of a bursting carbon bubble that has trillions of dollars in underpriced climate risk.”

We at Green Energy Times ask our readers to check on their banks, find out what they are doing, and stop supporting them if they are acting inappropriately.

 



* This article was originally published here